Macaulay Family Rejects Inclusion of Nationalist in Tinubu’s Mass Pardon

32
0
Nigeria President Bola Ahmed Tinubu

The descendants of the late Herbert Macaulay, widely regarded as Nigeria’s “Father of Nationalism,” have formally rejected the posthumous pardon granted to him by Bola Tinubu, claiming the gesture is disrespectful because it lumps their ancestor together with criminals.
During a press conference at his Ikoyi residence, former PDP deputy national chairman Olabode George—speaking on behalf of the family—said they appreciate the intent behind the pardon but object to the manner it was granted. “The pardon should not have been lumped up with drug barons, ex-convicts and murderers,” George stated.
The pardon was announced on 9 October 2025 when President Tinubu approved the exercise of prerogative of mercy for 175 persons, including Macaulay and others.
The family, however, argue that categorising Macaulay—a colonial-era activist imprisoned for his political fight for Nigerian self-rule—alongside modern criminals diminishes his legacy.
At the briefing, a number of Macaulay’s descendants joined George, including Erelu Adeola Macaulay, Lanre Oshodi, Mayokun Thomas, and Kofoworola Macaulay. They called on the federal government to recognise their patriarch with “an honour befitting his stature,” rather than a generic pardon. “If Papa is to be honoured, he must be honoured independently,” George said.
The family’s demands include the reconstruction of Macaulay’s historic residence at Marina, Lagos—a structure demolished during the colonial period to make way for the General Post Office. They argue that such a national monument would serve as lasting recognition of his contributions.
In response to the controversy, the Attorney‑General of the Federation, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), clarified that no convict has yet been released under the latest pardon list and that the process remains under review to ensure procedural compliance.
Analysts say the row reflects broader tensions in Nigeria over how the country honours its historical figures. While pardons are sometimes used as symbolic gestures, the Macaulay family’s reaction signals that many feel such acts must be handled with sensitivity to legacy and symbolism.
For now, the pardon remains on the books but the family’s rejection and demands pressure the government to revisit how it recognises Macaulay. Whether the administration will accede to calls for separate national honour remains to be seen.